nmg
Shop
NMG Shop · Conversion Campaign · May 18 – Jun 2, 2026

LocwhiteSummit:
Functional vs Emotional

A/B test comparing Functional Benefit (product efficacy) vs Emotional Benefit (confidence & transformation) messaging — optimised for lead form conversions (LocwhiteSummitForm).

Total Spend
฿18,781
Combined budget deployed
Conversions
83
Form fills (LocwhiteSummitForm)
Cost / Conversion
฿226
Blended CPR across both sets
Impressions
166,211
Total served
Link Clicks
3,208
Outbound clicks
Overall CTR
1.93%
Across both ad sets
Avg CPC
฿5.86
Blended cost per click

Ad Set Comparison

Emotional Benefit dominates on volume and engagement. Functional Benefit achieves a slightly lower cost per conversion — a meaningful trade-off worth isolating.

Ad Set A
Functional Benefit
✓ Lower CPR
Spend
฿7,511
40% of total budget
Conversions
35
42% of total conv.
Cost / Conv.
฿214.60
Best CPR
Impressions
91,177
Reach
53,486
CTR
0.94%
CPC
฿8.78
Ad Set B
Emotional Benefit
★ Winner — Volume & CTR
Spend
฿11,270
60% of total budget
Conversions
48
58% of total conv.
Cost / Conv.
฿234.80
฿20 higher than A
Impressions
75,034
Reach
57,475
CTR
3.14%
CPC
฿4.79

Performance Breakdown

Spend and conversion splits, CTR comparison, and hourly engagement pattern across both ad sets.

Spend Split
Budget allocation
฿18,781total
60/40
EMO/FUNC
Functional ฿7,511 Emotional ฿11,270
Conversions Split
Lead forms by ad set
83total
83
Total conv.
Functional 35 Emotional 48
CTR Comparison
Click-through rate by ad
3.3×EMO vs FUNC
Spend by Ad
Budget deployed per creative
Functional Emotional
Conversions by Ad
Lead form fills per creative
5_ใช้ครีมแรงฯtop performer
Functional Emotional

Engagement Breakdown

Emotional Benefit drives 23× more post engagements — the creative is landing emotionally, not just functionally. Reactions and saves signal intent.

Post Engagements
24,783
Comments
6
Post Shares
18
Post Saves
37
Link Clicks
3,208
Engagement Comparison
Key engagement metrics per ad set — note the scale difference
Functional Benefit Emotional Benefit

Ad-Level Performance

10 creatives tested across both ad sets. Ranked by spend. ★ marks the top-converting ad. Above Average quality rankings skew Functional.

Ad Ad Set Status Spend Impr. Reach Clicks CTR CPC Conv. CPR Engage. Quality

Campaign Summary

The test verdict, creative insights, and recommended next steps for LocwhiteSummit.

Test Verdict

Emotional wins on volume. Ad set B delivered 48 conversions vs 35 — a 37% lift in raw volume. CTR was 3.3× higher (3.14% vs 0.94%).

Functional wins on efficiency. Set A achieved ฿214.60 CPR — ฿20 lower than Emotional. At scale, that gap compounds.

One ad carried Emotional. Ad 5_ใช้ครีมแรงฯ alone drove all 48 conversions in Set B — the other ad (4_เปลี่ยนรอยฝ้า) produced zero.

What to Scale

Double down on Ad 5. 10,346 spend, 48 conversions, 4.46% CTR — the strongest signal in the test. Build 2–3 variants of this angle.

Keep Ad 3 (Functional). 3_ทางเลือกที่อ่อนโยนกว่า delivered 29 conversions at ฿163 CPR — most efficient ad in the test.

Above Average quality rankings on 1.2 creative. Ads marked quality avg or above run cheaper in auction — worth investing more budget here.

Next Steps

Pause zero-conversion ads. 1.1, 2_หยุดวงจรฝ้า, 4_เปลี่ยนรอยฝ้า — collectively spent ฿1,966 with 0 form fills.

Test a hybrid creative. Combine Emotional hook (pain point: "strong cream makes melasma worse") with Functional body (ingredient proof). Best of both signals.

Scale to ฿30K–฿50K with winning ads only. Meta signals are strong — the funnel has proven conversion at ฿163–฿226 CPR. More volume at this efficiency is achievable.